Tuesday, February 18, 2014

THE CRITIQUE OF SPL. REFORM BY FONETIC FREAKS

"Giving English a phonetic spelling system, with one symbol for each sound, would produce a range of ridiculous ill-effects, such as the following:"
  • Compound sounds like "J" (which is phonetically "D" + "ZH") would have to be clumsily spelled out in full (so becomes «dzhey»).
  •  
  • Trivial phonetic distinctions, as between the two kinds of "A" in "CHAMPION'S SWAG", or of "T" in "TEA STRAINER" would require distinct spellings; and subtle dialectal vowel distinctions - as between Glaswegian and Bronx versions of "CAT" - would further confuse matters.

  • "Do you want to?" would have to be spelt the way it's pronounced - as one word, «dzhawonnuh?»"   Gus prefers to represent words as spoken but even he recognizes the utility of word divisions.   du u want tu.  I think spelling this phrase as spoken in  NYC would be difficult for QicRyt.  All positional writing systems have some problems writing dialect.   j'w'na?


SB:  There is a difference between 100% phonetic, 100% phonemic, and more phonemic than TS.
I think that David Crystal uses a variant  of this argument in his critique of spelling reform.  English has too many dialects so a phonemic representation is impossible.

The transcription challenges mentioned above might be spelled these ways in a more phonemic notation::   
WLO: jáy, champiònz swag té stránèr     Webster; já, champiønz té stránør  ( In WLO te is also possible, ja is not since it would have to be distinguished from the other free vowel ä.)
RLS:   jei,
caempiønz swæg ti streinør   note: j= /dZ/, c = /tS/, ø = ə   schwa



      JR: The correct response to this argument, overlooked surprisingly often by supposed experts, is "You nitwit!  Who said anything about a phonetic system?  All we need is one that's roughly graphemic ("one reading per grapheme") and preferably phonemic ("one spelling per phoneme") and/or morphemic  ("one spelling per morpheme")."  

Grapheme
the basic unit of orthography.  Usually in alphabet-based writing systems equivalent to a letter; however, compound graphemes made up of several parts (eg <Å, NG, Æ>) are also common and may count as separate items. (more)
Phoneme
the basic unit of phonology.  Each phoneme is not so much a particular sound as a set of sounds conventionally grouped together by a given language or dialect.  Variations within the set are disregarded; but distinctions between phonemes are used to tell words apart (eg ).  Note that it is quite possible for a single phoneme to be a "compound" of several sounds   (more)
Morpheme
the basic unit of morphology; a meaningful building-block in word-construction, either to coin new dictionary words ("derivation", eg ) or just to modify them to suit their role in the sentence ("inflection", eg ). (more)
"In such a system, 
  • The compound phoneme /dZ/, which functions as a unit in the English sound system, can conveniently be spelt with the letter «J».

  • Phonetic variants of /&/ or /t/ are no concern of a well-designed script; dialectal cases - especially ones as trivial as the one quoted above - are easy to handle  (see below).
  • If the individual words are pronounced in isolation as «du, yu, wont, tu», nothing is forcing us to put the reduced versions in the dictionary (any more than we need to put glottal stops in the alphabet)."
  • SB:  Most critics of more phonemic spelling have not figured out  that their critiques also apply to the dictionary
    pronunciation guide.  A more phonemic writing system is just a step closer to a dictionary representation.
    The features include no surplus characters, one reading per grapheme (no code overlaps but there may
    be more than one way to represent a phoneme).
JR: Word-recognition, treating words (or occasionally syllables) as arbitrary units to be memorized. This can be a useful skill once mastered, but a painful one to acquire - ask any Japanese kid. The way the current orthography forces learners to handle many common words as single arbitrary glyphs (doesn't one though? for 'dVzn@nt wVn Do) is a stumbling-block many schoolchildren never really get over. The upshot is that spelling reform might be briefly awkward for word-recognizers, but would eventually help even them - if only because it allows more hieroglyphs on a page! For children (and many, many adults), it would be a huge, immediate, and permanent improvement. Or at least, as good as permanent: the current orthodox system has already outlived its best-before date by half a millennium, so we can leave the next reform for Buck Rogers to worry about.

Saturday, January 11, 2014

An alphabet as a GP table

Grapheme Phoneme Correspondences or GP Table for RITE
(Reduced Irregularity in Traditional English)


RITEspel is the reform proposal preferred by many who worked on the minimal change notation known as House Stile. HS was phonemic only with respect to 9 vowels positioned before a consonant. 5 short vowels aeiou or {EIOV in SAMPA and 4 long vowels. In multisyllable words the short vowels had to be followed by a double consonant: att... ett.. itt... ott.. utt.. as it attitude but not attack. *attack would retain the ck after the stressed short vowel but drop the extra t in the unstressed syllable. The long vowels in maid, mede, might, moat would have to be respelled made, meed, mite, mote.

Phonemicity is extended in RITE as shown in the GP Table below.. The Alfubet Key for RITE 40 phonograms: 18 vowels - 22 consonants vowels in one syllable words and endings are positional An alphabet is a grapheme-phoneme correspondence table: A collection of sound signs linking visible marks to speech sounds I haven't discovered the way to import a table in rich text so you will have to go here.

http://web.archive.org/web/20031025162400/http://www.unifon.org/kliyrspel.html 

 For the full set of rules go to RITE http://www.ritespel.org/  

Bad Arguments Against Spelling Reform A well designed and humorous presentation of the misguided arguments against sound spelling and spelling reform. http://web.archive.org/web/20080606034608/http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/vangogh/555/Spell/badarguments.htm

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Quick Write (Qic Ryt)


Gus Hasslequist has proposed QicRyt as a briefer way to spell in English.
QicRyt often references two sounds (phonemes) with one symbol. However, it
is not as ambiguous in pronunciation as traditional English (TS).

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/saundspel/files/schemes-on-1p



QicRyt (Quick Write) Rules on 1 p.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/saundspel/files/schemes-on-1p/QR

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/saundspel/message/46264

SB: QR is a positional quasi-phonemic transcription for speed typing, space saving, and texting. There is one associated phoneme per position per letter. So the letter itself can have up to 3 different interpretations: Stand alone, onset, and after a consonant...

There is a code overlap with respect to /A/. it can be a or o
pot is spelled pot which would be /pAt/ in Gen. Amer.
father /fA:D@`/ is spelled fadr. *all is spelled ol (pronounced ahl).

There is a positional code overlap with respect to I and my /aI/ /maI/.
These would never be confused due to positional constraints.
I don't deny he really reeks rye = I dont diny hi ri'li riks ry

A few different letters can have the same sound association: e.g. I and yC and Cy. If the consonant (C) was t: I lyc cyts = (I like kites)


Context can usually sort out the mergers and ambiguities. e.g., Y and wy.
You will never see *wy for *why because the shortest reference is always used.

The vowel assignments are

V short long
a e /E/ e /eI/
e i /i/ i /i:/ I like it very much I lyk it veri mk.
i i /I/ y /aI/
o o /A Q O/ o /oU/ odd spot spa = od spot spa /Qd-Ad spAt spA:/
u u /U/ u /u:/ /ju:/ book boot rebuke buk but ribuk
u ' /V/ u /ju:/ b'c for buck us=ooze or use or ooce or yooce.


There are 14 vowels and only 5 vowel letters.
QR copes with this by reassigning the front vowels and merging the short and long sounds. let = let or late, did = did or deed. od = odd, ahd, awed, ode

a = /{ ae/ /A:/ /@/ at àbout = abwt, spa=spa
a = uh /@/ when alone
e = /E/ or /eI/ elf=elf way=we they=de acorn= ecorn, ábèl=ebl,
i = i: or I wee = wi, very = veri, it=it eat=it
I = /aI/ when alone.
y = why when alone
y = /aI/ /waI/ why or consonant y) flight=flyt icy eyes= 'ysi 'ys
o = A O Q oU all=ol /ôl/ mote = mot /mót/ moth=mot /môth/
u = u or U
' = V or @ abut = 'b't

The moth flew to a remote island 2 spawn.
D mot flu 2 a rimot ylnd 2 spon.


GUS: Qicryt is a way of spelling English, far easier to learn and use than
Traditional Spelling (TS), for the following reasons:
It has 85% phonemicity versus just 65% for TS, even though it’s over
75% similar to TS in usage of symbols, yet it has less than 65% of
TS’s typical word length. After learning the alphabet, numeral and
other keyboard symbol names, and then Qicryt’s rules, illiterates who
know how to speak the language and be generally understood, should be
able to read and write in it within only weeks, as compared with the
many years needed to do so, still not as proficiently, with TS. Qicryt
has less than a single standard (8.5”x11”) page of rules to learn in
contrast to the many thousands of words requiring memorization by TS.
Except for a few words within the rules, there is even no need to know
TS at all. One merely spells the words the simplest/shortest way (per
those rules) they’re spoken. However, Qicryt’s similarity to TS does
enable it some backward compatibility, allowing one to be able to read
much of TS itself. Possibly due at least partially to that similarity
to TS, some adepts of TS have found Qicryt easy to write in and to
read even faster than in TS without completely knowing its rules. As
it’s much shorter in its spelling of individual words than is TS’s,
aside from the resultant benefits to the environment, adepts should be
able to save close to a third of their remaining reading/writing
lifetimes and that monetary value, once they’ve really become
accustomed to its use – that savings alone, the most personally
worthwhile reason for an adept to discard TS in favor of a more
phonemic system. Thus, everyone gains who uses it, and therefore
Qicryt should benefit the whole world on it replacing TS. Try it and
see for yourself – and join the Qicryt bandwagon.!!

The above, written in Qicryt as are the rules following, with a TS
version below those for comparison:

Qicryt is a we v spelq English, far isi’r t lrn & us dan Traditional
Spelling (TS), 4 d foloiq risns:

It hs 85% fonimisiti vs jst 65% 4 TS, ivn do its ovr 75% in simleriti
t TS in simbl usij, yet it hs les dan 65% v TSs tipicl wrd leqt. Aftr
lrnq d alf’bet, numr’l & ‘dr cibord simbl nems, & den Qicryts ruls,
ilitr’ts hu no hw t spic d laqwij & b jenr’li ‘ndrstud, zd b ebl t rid
& ryt in it widin onli wics, as cmperd wid d meni yirs nidd t du so,
stil nt as pr’fizntli, wid TS. Qicryt hs les dan a siql standrd
(8.5”x11”) pej v ruls t lrn in contrast t d meni 1000s v wrds ricwyrq
memrisezn by TS. Xept 4 a fu wrds widin d ruls, dr is ivn no nid t no
TS at ol. 1 mirli spels d wrds d simplst, zortst we (pr dos ruls) der
spokn. Hwevr, Qicryts simleriti t TS ds inebl it sm bacwrd
cmpatbiliti, ‘lwq 1 t b ebl t rid mk v TS itself. Posibli du at list
parzli t dt simleriti t TS, sm ‘depts v TS hv fwnd Qicryt isi t ryt in
& t rid ivn fastr dan in TS widwt cmplitli noiq its ruls. As its mk
zortr in its spelq v indvidul wrds dan is TSs, ‘syd fr’m d ris’ltnt
ben’fits t d invyrmnt, ‘depts zd b ebl t sev clos t a 3rd v dr rimenq
ridq/rytq lyftyms & dt mon’teri valu, 1s dev rili bicm ‘cstmd t its us
- dt sevqs ‘lon, d most prs’nli wrtwyl risn 4 n ‘dept t discard TS in
fevr v a mor fonimic sistm. Ds, evri1 gens hu uss it, & dr4 Qicryt zd
ben’fit d hol wrld on it riplesq TS. Try it & si 4 yrself - & join d
Qicryt bandwagn.!!

QICRYT RULS
Spel swnds spocn in General American (GA) English pr d
simplst/zortst dinotezn usd by d Merriam-Webster (MW) diczneri, pr d
foloiq ruls, do nt 4 propr nems. (*) dinots Traditional Spelling (TS)
‘nlyc Qicryts.

Vwls:
4 dos swnds cnsidrd loq or diftoqs, us:
1a. ‘e’ as in ‘cafe’. 1b. ‘i’ as in ‘taxi’. 1c. ‘i’ also, as in
‘ion’, bt jst inizli bi4 vwls olwes zon, ‘y’ usd ‘drwys as in 'ylm'
(*'ylem') & ‘drys’. 1d. ‘o’ as in ‘go’. 1e. ‘u’ as in ‘tun’ (*’tune’)
& *‘yoo’ swnds as in ‘us’ (*’use’), ends as in ‘nu’ (*’knew’). 1f.
‘oi’ as in ‘boil’. 1g. ‘ow’ as in ‘owl’ if inizl, bt onli ‘w’ elswer
as in ‘acwnt’ (*’account’) & ‘twr’ (*’tower’).

4 dos zort or modifyd by d swnd v ‘r’, us:
2a. ‘a’ as in 'bat' & ‘axnt’ (*‘accent’). 2b. ‘e’ as in ‘bet’, bt
omit it evriwer bi4 ‘x’ as in ‘txt’ (*’text’). 2c. ‘i’ in 'bit', bt
omit it if inizl bi4 ‘x’ (‘xist’ 4 ‘i’ swndq ‘e’ in *‘exist’, do
‘fix’), bt us it bi4 ‘q’ aftr vwls as in ‘goiq’ (*’going’) &
‘distroiiq’ (*’destroying’) do nt aftr vwls ‘w’, ‘y’ (‘bwq’ 4
*’bowing’) or consnnts as in ‘pikq’ (*’picking’) xept ‘w’, ‘y’ (‘wiq’
4 *’wing’) & in ruts (’stiq’ 4 *’sting’). 2d. ‘o’ as in ‘dog’, ‘ol’
(*‘all’), ‘cot’, wid ’a’ at rut ends (‘spa’). 2e. ‘u’ as in 'put' & 4
*‘yur’ swnds as in ‘pur’ (*’pure’). 2f. ‘ar’ as in ‘art’. 2g. ‘er’ 4
d swnds in *‘merry’, *‘marry’ (‘meri’) & *’mare’ (‘mer’). 2h. ‘ir’ as
in ‘hir’ (*’hear’). 2i. ‘or’ as in ‘orb’.

4 dos zwa or *‘uh’ swnds, us:
3a. ‘ (n ‘postr’fi) if n indicezn is nidd t difyn d swnd, as ‘fr’m’ vs
‘frm’ (*’from’ vs *’firm’), wid qotezn marcs usd 4 capitls & brac’ts 4
qotezns. 3b. no simbls if *‘uh’ swnds cn b posibli cnstrud or implyd
widwt dm, as in ‘sstnnss’ (*’sustenances’).

Consnnts:

4 dos wid siql simbls & swnds, us:
4a. ‘b’ as in 'bib'; ‘c’ in ‘critic’; ‘f’ in ‘fl’f’ (*'fluff'); ‘g’ in
'gag'; ‘h’ in 'hit'; ‘j’ in ‘jj’ (*'judge'); ‘k’ as in
‘krk’(*’church’); ‘l’ in ‘ll’ (*'lull'); ‘m’ in ‘mm’ (*'mum'); ‘n’ in
‘nn’ (*'nun'); ‘p’ in 'pip'; ‘r’ in ‘rir’ (*'rear'); ‘v’ in ‘valv’
(*'valve').

4 dos wid mltipl spelqs &/or swnds, us:
5a. ‘d’ as in 'did' & 4 past tenss as in ‘stopd’ (*’stopped’), & as
*‘th’ in *'then' (‘den’). 5b. ‘q’ as *‘qu’ in *’quick’ (‘qic’) onli
inizli, ‘cw’ usd aftr as in ‘icwip’ (*’equip’), olso ‘q’ 4 *‘ng’, drby
‘siq’ (*'sing'), ’siql’ (*’single’) or ‘am’q’ (*’among’), bt ‘n’ bi4
‘c’, ‘k’, ‘x’ or ‘z’ as in ‘anz’s’ (*‘anxious’). 5c. ‘s’ in 'sets' &
‘is’. 5d. ‘t’ in 'tot' & as *‘th’ in *'thick' (‘tic’). 5e. ‘w’ in
'wed' & 4 *‘wh’ in *'when’ (‘wen’); ‘y’ in ‘yoyo’ olwes inizl in
sil’bls; bot ‘w’ & ‘y’ bi4 vwls olwes zon, as in ‘swiq’ (*’swing’) &
‘mily’n’ (*‘million’), xept 4 ‘w’ if inizl or aftr a vwl in a rut bi4
a cnstru’bl *’uh’ swnd as in ‘wr’ (*’were’), bt us ‘yr’ 4 *’your’.
5f. ‘x’ 4 ‘gz’ & ‘ks’ swnds as in ‘tax’ 4 *‘tacks’. 5g. ‘z’ 4 d *’sh’
sounds in *’shush’ (‘zz’) & d *‘zh’ swnd in ‘azr’ (*’azure’).

Mis’leni:
4 dos in adizn t or insted v the ‘bv, us:
6a. 4 wrds wen ‘lon: ‘a’ 4 articl ‘a’, ‘b’ 4 *’be’ (bt ‘biiq’ 4
*’being’), ‘d’ 4 *‘the’, ‘i’ 4 pronwn *’I’, *’aye’ & *’eye’ (‘i’s’ 4
*’eyes’ bt ‘ybol’ 4 *‘eyeball’), ‘m’ 4 *’am’, ‘n’ 4 *’an’, ‘r’ 4
*’are’ (bt ‘arnt’ 4 *’aren’t’) & *’our’, ‘s’ 4 *‘us’, ‘t’ 4 *’to’, ‘u’
4 *’you’, ‘v’ 4 ‘of’, ‘y’ 4 *’why’. 6b. numr’ls 4 nmbrs t a mily’n,
onli speld owt t ‘void frod, sk as ‘wn’ for *’one’, & in/4 wrds as ‘1’
in ‘1s’ (*’once’), ‘2’ in ‘in2’ (*’into’) & 4 *'too', ‘4’ in ‘bi4’
(*’before’) & 4 *'for', & ‘8’ in ‘l8r’ (*’later’). 6c. ‘&’ 4 *’and’,
‘%’ 4 *’percent’, ‘$’ 4 *’dollar’ & ‘+’ 4 *’plus’.
4 sel-fon SMS txtq, d foloiq me b usd in hol or in part, adiznl
t or insted v d ‘bv:

7a. d simbls: ‘?’ 4 *’question’, ‘=’ 4 *’equal’, ‘@’ 4 ‘at’, ‘^’ 4
‘up’, ‘#’ 4 *‘pound’, ‘*’ 4 ‘star’, ‘<’ 4 *‘back’, ‘>’ 4 *‘ahead’,
‘w/o’ 4 *‘without’, olso smylis lyk ‘:-(‘ 4 ‘sad’, *‘happy’ as ‘:-)’,
& acr’nims lyk ‘imo’ 4 *‘in my opinion’. 7b. omizn v capitls, dinotd
if disyrd, by piri’ds b4 dr lo’r-ces cwntrparts (‘.god’ 4 ‘God’).
4 clerificezn, if contxt is ins’fiznt, d foloiq me b usd in hol
or in part, adiznl t or insted v d ‘bv:

8a. d vwl simbls: ‘é’ or ‘ei’ in *’veil’, ‘ï’ or ‘ii’ as *’ee’ in
*’feel’, ‘µ’ or ‘iu’ as *‘ue’ in *’cue’, ’ó’ or ‘o’’ as *’o’ in
*’note’, ‘ö’ or ‘o;’ as *’aw’ in *’saw’, ‘ú’ or ‘u’’ as *’oo’ in
*’ooze’. 8b. d consnnt simbls: ‘ð‘ or ‘dh’ in *’dhal’, ‘ß’ or ‘s;’ as
*’zz’ in *’buzz’, ‘þ’ or ‘th’ in *’thin’, ‘z;’ as *’ge’ in *’beige’.
8c. stresd vwls t b capit’lysd aftr a wrds 1st sil’bl.

QICRYT RULES
Spell sounds spoken in General American (GA) English per the
simplest/shortest denotation used by the Merriam-Webster (MW)
dictionary, per the following rules, tho not for proper names. (*)
denotes Traditional Spelling (TS) unlike Qicryt’s.

Vowels:
For those sounds considered long or diphthongs, use:
1a. ‘e’ as in ‘cafe’. 1b. ‘i’ as in ‘taxi’. 1c. ‘i’ also, as in
‘ion’, but just initially before vowels always shown, ‘y’ used
otherwise as in 'ylm' (*'ylem') & ‘drys’. 1d. ‘o’ as in ‘go’. 1e.
‘u’ as in ‘tun’ (*’tune’) and *‘yoo’ sounds as in ‘us’ (*’use’), ends
as in ‘nu’ (*’knew’). 1f. ‘oi’ as in ‘boil’. 1g. ‘ow’ as in ‘owl’ if
initial, but only its ‘w’ elsewhere as in ‘acwnt’ (*’account’) and
‘twr’ (*’tower’).

For those short or modified by the sound of ‘r’, use:
2a. ‘a’ as in 'bat' and ‘axnt’ (*‘accent’). 2b. ‘e’ as in ‘bet’, but
omit it everywhere before ‘x’ as in ‘txt’ (*’text’). 2c. ‘i’ in
'bit', but omit it if initial before ‘x’ (‘xist’ for ‘i’ sounding ‘e’
in *‘exist’, tho ‘fix’), but use it before ‘q’ after vowels as in
‘goiq’ (*’going’) and ‘distroiiq’ (*’destroying’) tho not after vowels
‘w’, ‘y’ (‘bwq’ for *’bowing’) or consonants as in ‘pikq’ (*’picking’)
except ‘w’, ‘y’ (‘wiq’ for *’wing’) and in roots (’stiq’ for
*’sting’). 2d. ‘o’ as in ‘dog’, ‘ol’ (*‘all’), ‘cot’, with ’a’ at
root ends (‘spa’). 2e. ‘u’ as in 'put' & for *‘yur’ sounds as in
‘pur’ (*’pure’). 2f. ‘ar’ as in ‘art’. 2g. ‘er’ for the sounds in
*‘merry’, *‘marry’ (‘meri’) and *’mare’ (‘mer’). 2h. ‘ir’ as in ‘hir’
(*’hear’). 2i. ‘or’ as in ‘orb’.
For those schwa or *‘uh’ sounds, use:
3a. ‘ (an apostrophe) if an indication is needed to define the sound,
as ‘fr’m’ vs ‘frm’ (*’from’ vs *’firm’), with quotation marks used for
capitals and brackets for quotations. 3b. no symbols if *‘uh’ sounds
can be possibly construed or implied without them, as in ‘sstnnss’
(*’sustenances’).

Consonants:
For those with single symbols and sounds, use:
4a. ‘b’ as in 'bib'; ‘c’ in ‘critic’; ‘f’ in ‘fl’f’ (*'fluff'); ‘g’ in
'gag'; ‘h’ in 'he'; ‘j’ in ‘jj’ (*'judge'); ‘k’ as in
‘krk’(*’church’); ‘l’ in ‘ll’ (*'lull'); ‘m’ in ‘mm’ (*'mum'); ‘n’ in
‘nn’ (*'nun'); ‘p’ in 'pip'; ‘r’ in ‘rir’ (*'rear'); ‘v’ in ‘valv’
(*'valve').

For those with multiple spellings and/or sounds, use:
5a. ‘d’ as in 'did' and for past tenses as in ‘stopd’ (*’stopped’),
and as *‘th’ in *'then' (‘den’). 5b. ‘q’ as *‘qu’ in *’quick’ (‘qic’)
only initially, ‘cw’ used after as in ‘icwip’ (*’equip’), also ‘q’ for
*‘ng’, thereby ‘siq’ (*'sing'), ’siql’ (*’single’) or ‘am’q’
(*’among’), but ‘n’ before ‘c’, ‘k’, ‘x’ or ‘z’ as in ‘anz’s’
(*‘anxious’). 5c. ‘s’ in 'sets' and ‘is’. 5d. ‘t’ in 'tot' and as
*‘th’ in *'thick' (‘tic’). 5e. ‘w’ in 'wed' and for *‘wh’ in *'whet’
(‘wet’); ‘y’ in ‘yoyo’ always initial in syllables; both ‘w’ and ‘y’
before vowels always shown, as in ‘swiq’ (*’swing’) and ‘mily’n’
(*‘million’), except for ‘w’ if initial or after a vowel in a root
before a construable *’uh’ sound as in ‘wr’ (*’were’), but use ‘yr’
for *’your’. 5f. ‘x’ for ‘gz’ and ‘ks’ sounds as in ‘tax’ for
*‘tacks’. 5g. ‘z’ for the *’sh’ sounds in *’shush’ (‘zz’) and the
*‘zh’ sound in ‘azr’ (*’azure’).

Miscellany:
For those in addition to or instead of the above, use:
6a. for words when alone: ‘a’ for article ‘a’, ‘b’ for *’be’ (but
‘biiq’ for *’being’), ‘d’ for *‘the’, ‘i’ for pronoun *’I’, *’aye’ and
*’eye’ (‘i’s’ for *’eyes’ but ‘ybol’ for *‘eyeball’), ‘m’ for *’am’,
‘n’ for *’an’, ‘r’ for *’are’ (but ‘arnt’ for *’aren’t’) and *’our’,
‘s’ for ‘us’, ‘t’ for *’to’, ‘u’ for *’you’, ‘v’ for ‘of’, ‘y’ for
*’why’. 6b. numerals for numbers to a million, only spelled to avoid
fraud, such as ‘wn’ for *’one’, and in/for words as ‘1’ in ‘1s’
(*’once’), ‘2’ in ‘in2’ (*’into’) and for *'too’, ‘4’ in ‘bi4’
(*’before’) and for *'for', and ‘8’ in ‘l8r’ (*’later’). 6c. ‘&’ for
*’and’, ‘%’ for *’percent’, ‘$’ for *’dollar’ and ‘+’ for *’plus’.
For cell-phone SMS texting, the following may be used in whole
or in part, additional to or instead of the above:

7a. the symbols: '?’ for *’question’, ‘=’ for *’equal’, ‘@’ for ‘at’,
‘^’ for ‘up’, ‘#’ for *‘pound’, ‘*’ for ‘star’, ‘<’ for *‘back’, ‘>’
for *‘ahead’, ‘w/o’ for *‘without’, also smileys like ‘:-(‘ for ‘sad’,
*‘happy’ as ‘:-)’, and acronyms like ‘imo’ for *‘in my opinion’. 7b.
omission of capitals, denoted if desired, by periods before their
lower-case counterparts (‘.god’ for ‘God’).

For clarification, if context is insufficient, the following may
be used in whole or in part, additional to or instead of the above:
8a. the vowel symbols: ‘é’ or ‘ei’ in *’veil’, ‘ï’ or ‘ii’ as *’ee’ in
*’feel’, ‘µ’ or ‘iu’ as *‘ue’ in *’cue’, ’ó’ or ‘o’’ as *’o’ in
*’note’, ‘ö’ or ‘o;’ as *’aw’ in *’saw’, ‘ú’ or ‘u’’ as *’u’ in
*’flute’. 8b. the consonant symbols: ‘ð‘ or ‘dh’ in *’dhal’, ‘ß’ or
‘s;’ as *’zz’ in *’buzz’, ‘þ’ or ‘th’ in *’thin’, ‘z;’ as *’ge’ in
*’beige’. 8c. stressed vowels to be capitalized after a word’s first
syllable.






http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/wKrQS6qGEeMxbW5z3olU9i3EVv-XBZQNhtBTXPRnOZfQMEt52p6RYj0oJ4WrrSPwNsCy4GYwl4pooKEUNO1Q/vowel-charts/euro-english-dg.html

Saturday, February 21, 2009

70% of the public supports some spelling reform

Are these the kind of updates
that 70% of the public support?

According to the survey sponsored by the Spelling Society,
70% of the general public favors tidying up English or at least
fixing about 100 words.

Q2. Would you support updating one hundred
or so words in the English spelling system?

Over 69% said yes.

The study can be found at www.spellingsociety.org

SB:  Now we need to get more specific.
Which words  need to be fixed?

Identifying the words in need of respelling has long been the
activity of the spelling society.  Better spellings was a significant
topic of disucssion at the quarterly meetings in the beginning.
(circa 1908) 

In an earlier decade, spelling reformers identified this list of
words most in need of respelling. 


























































The two proposed minimal change reforms, HS and RV would eliminate 98%
of these silly spellings.  

Not sure if  over 50% of TS  adepts want to have f = /f/. Fillis has a foto fone


Saturday, November 29, 2008

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=481895832956843267&postID=3790282132945837367



steve said...

I just happened upon this orthographic blog.
I have not figured out what the point is other than to identify odd

or at least non-standard spellings.

Vivian Cook included many of these in his book.

Is there some objection to using dicitonary key spelling for traditional spelling?
If so what is it?

"bizkits" doesn't quite correspond to the dictionary pronunciation of the word /'bisk@ts/
Perhaps there should be a distinction between phonemic spellings and spellings that don't match the way the word is spelled.


staind or stánd for stained seem OK for /'steInd/.

nü for new works in General American. It does not work in some other dialects of English.neu and neuz have been proposed as an alternative to represent the pronunciation /nju:/.
"nu metal" could be shortened to *nu metl using the syllabic L.


November 29, 2008 3:01 AM


original posting on blog
http://perplexikon.blogspot.com/2008/11/korn-and-bizkits-staind-my-new-apron.html


Ever heard of Korn, Trapt, Staind, Limp Bizkit, or Linkin Park? Welcome to the sub-genre of alternative rock that is lamely known as "Nu Metal." A fad at best, this post-grunge movement seems to be capsizing in today's mainstream pool of feces including Saving Abel, Buckcherry, Hinder, and other feeble attempts at alternative rock.

Nu Metal, considered the arch enemy of REAL METAL, is a hybrid of distorted (or clean) drop-tuned guitars, aggressive vocals (sometimes confused with shouting and/or rapping), and distinct (read: sort of distinct) hip-hop influence. You know, with those phat turntable beats and a little sampling here 'n there.

According to worldwidewords.org the word "Nu" is considered a respelling of the word "New." According to my pathetic Internets research, Nu is some sort of Yiddish term to express "So?" Nu, true origin is to be determined.

Nu Metal bands have more in common than being slopped together in this adolescent-at-best genre: a pretty large number of their names are intentionally misspelled, or, as they say, "respelled." This is not limited to nu metal, but also musicians from other genres (most notably of the rap and hip hop persuasion) like Snoop Dogg, Boyz 2 Men, Ludacris, and even the Monkees, the Byrds, and Lynyrd Skynyrd.

In the distant future I will gather morsels of information on select musicians and the origins of their name and write klever entries about them.

What is Staind's link to Paradise Lost...? Find out soon!

Friday, December 7, 2007

comment on abecedaria

http://abecedaria.blogspot.com/2005/07/unifon.html

This blog is very well done. Interesting commentary ...
and a very pleasing layout.

Coulmas says that a phonemic orthography would . . .

-discard morphemic invariances
-cut etymological connections
-respell proper nouns and
-disrupt spelling habits.

As you note, there are hundreds of ways that the traditional writing system could be made more phonemic.

Most of the proposals that I have seen do not respell surnames or any proper noun that has an established symbolic value.

New Spelling (Soundspel) was found to have less morphemic variation than traditional spelling. Coulmas made an assumption that proves to be false in at least one case.

If we respelled the 100 most common irregular words, the public would find many of the new spellings annoying. If we respelled the low frequency spelling patterns, few would even notice.

The problem is that thru constant usage, written words acquire nuances and meanings that are lost when they are spelled in a manner similar to a dictionary key.

*chauffeur spelled "showfur" or "shófr" or "$ÓF3R" doesn't quite cut it.

Kids, of course, would find the shorter more phonemic spellings easier to learn and use.

They could learn a dictionary key spelling in 3 months, transition to traditional children's books and be reading at a 3rd grade level by the end of the first grade.

This was the beauty of a transitory alphabet such as Unifon.

There is a resemblance between Unifon and other scripts but this misses the point.

Unifon is a dictionary key that reshapes 17 letters to extend the alphabet so there is one symbol per sound. The other scripts use unique shapes but Moon and Utopia are not more phonemic than the set of Latin characters.

Here is another script that combines pictographic cues and streamlined letter forms, in a phonemic notation.

http://foolswisdom.com/users/sbett/43pmf-cap.gif

I think it is easier to read than Utopian ... but PMF is strange.